59 
0 
The government initiative, 18app, introduced in Italy in 2016 seemed promising, offering young people an opportunity to experience and appreciate cultural activities. The program aimed to grant every Italian citizen, who turned 18 years old, a 500 euros bonus to spend on cultural events including theater, cinema, concerts, and museum visits. While the concept was commendable, there are significant flaws within the 18app system that limit its potential and hinder its effectiveness.
Firstly, the limited range of cultural activities covered by 18app is a major drawback. While theater, cinema, and concerts are popular choices for many young people, there are various other cultural experiences that were overlooked. For instance, the program fails to include local or regional festivals, art workshops, dance performances, and literary events. By neglecting these options, the program restricts the diversity of cultural experiences that young people can explore.
Moreover, the allocation process and usage of the bonus money itself have proven to be inconvenient. To activate the bonus, users are required to download a specific app or visit a dedicated website. This requirement adds unnecessary steps and complications, making it difficult for some young people, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds, to access the benefit. Additionally, the bonus has an expiration date of three months, which imposes a time constraint and pressure on young adults to spend the funds quickly, often leading to hasty choices rather than well-thought-out decisions.
Furthermore, the limited availability of tickets has been a significant issue. Due to high demand and limited supply, most popular and sought-after cultural events are often sold out quickly. This leaves many young people frustrated as they are unable to utilize their bonus to attend events they are interested in. The scarcity of available seats acts as a deterrent and dampens the overall enthusiasm and motivation created by the 18app initiative.
A critical flaw in the 18app program is the lack of communication and promotion. Many young people remain unaware of the initiative’s existence or are unfamiliar with how to access and utilize the bonus. The government needs to invest more effort in spreading awareness about the program to ensure maximum participation and engagement. Adequate promotion through various channels, such as schools, social media, and community events, can significantly improve the program’s effectiveness.
Moreover, the 18app program fails to provide any form of feedback or evaluation system. By not obtaining feedback from the users, it becomes challenging to assess the program’s impact and identify areas for improvement. Incorporating an evaluation mechanism would allow the government to understand the participants’ preferences and tailor the initiative accordingly, ensuring that it remains relevant and meets the needs of young people.
In conclusion, while the 18app program may have had good intentions, its flaws have limited its potential and effectiveness. The narrow range of cultural activities covered, complicated allocation process, limited availability of tickets, lack of promotion, and absence of a feedback system all contribute to the program’s shortcomings. By addressing these issues, the government can revitalize the 18app initiative, making it more accessible, diverse, and appealing to young people, thus fostering a deeper appreciation for culture and the arts.
0 | 
0