Why aren’t we “eight?” This seemingly strange statement relates to the world of the Knights of the Round Table, specifically highlighting the absence of Sir Lancelot, whose name has been anglicized as Lancillotto. Lancelot is one of the most prominent figures within Arthurian legend, and his absence from the round table signals a significant loss. Unraveling the reasons behind Lancelot’s missing presence can shed light on the impact he would have had on the powerful and symbolic number eight.

To understand why Lancelot’s presence is crucial, we must first acknowledge the significance of the number eight in Arthurian mythology. The Round Table, where the knights would gather for chivalric discussions and decisions, is often portrayed as having a seating arrangement for twelve knights. However, it is believed that the number of “active” knights, participating in quests and adventures, was eight. This group of eight knights formed the core, the champions of King Arthur. Their unity and purpose as a team brought balance and represented the unity of the kingdom.

Each of the eight active knights personifies an essential virtue or attribute. For instance, Sir Gawain embodies valor and courage, while Sir Galahad represents purity and righteousness. These knights are often depicted as the epitome of chivalry and their actions, adventures, and character traits serve as exemplary lessons for the medieval audience.

The absence of Sir Lancelot creates a void within this harmonious group of eight, as he is widely regarded as the greatest knight of the Arthurian world. Lancelot possesses several qualities that make him an iconic and indispensable figure. His extraordinary swordsmanship, boundless loyalty to King Arthur, and passionate love for Queen Guinevere make him a complex and intriguing character. Stories of his exploits, rescues, and steadfastness in times of danger are legendary.

Furthermore, Lancelot’s presence would add an inherent tension and conflict to the group of knights. His illicit love affair with Queen Guinevere, Arthur’s wife, introduces a dichotomy between chivalric ideals and personal desires. This internal strife within the group would deepen the exploration of human nature, morality, and choices. Lancelot’s character would fuel moral dilemmas for other knights, forcing them to question their own values and loyalty.

The absence of Lancillotto’s character in the Arthurian legend may stem from various reasons. One possibility is that his story and persona were intentionally left out or downplayed by later writers to maintain the idealized and unified image of the Knights of the Round Table. Another explanation could be that his character, being so complex and morally ambiguous, threatened the simplicity and chivalric integrity the Arthurian legends often aimed to convey.

Nonetheless, the impact of Lancillotto’s character cannot be ignored, and his absence is felt profoundly in the Arthurian narrative. His inclusion as the eighth knight would have served as a crucial counterpoint to the other knights, challenging their virtues and testing their resolutions.

In conclusion, the absence of Sir Lancelot, also known as Lancillotto, from the Round Table leaves us without the number eight and robs the Arthurian legend of a significant character. Lancelot’s absence denies the stories the opportunity to explore complex moral dilemmas, human desires, and the challenging nature of loyalty. Acknowledging the importance of Lancillotto’s character enhances our understanding of the Arthurian world while leaving us longing for the complete and balanced numeral dixuit.

Quest'articolo è stato scritto a titolo esclusivamente informativo e di divulgazione. Per esso non è possibile garantire che sia esente da errori o inesattezze, per cui l’amministratore di questo Sito non assume alcuna responsabilità come indicato nelle note legali pubblicate in Termini e Condizioni
Quanto è stato utile questo articolo?
0Vota per primo questo articolo!